Author ｜
Liu Yu-chihg
Abstract ｜
In the past, a “Han traitor” studies focused frequently on how to create a Han imagined community, but this paper tried to focus on how a traitor was used in human resources management, military, politics and in the discourse strategies, to discuss a “Han traitor” as a symbol regarding with national identity. Therefore, this article discusses the following three aspects of this topic: Firstly, a “Han traitor” occurred in what historical condition? How did it develop politically and militarily in a historical context? Were there any related terms could be corresponded with it?Secondly, when China was in war, there were any different meaning by applications or contents in terms of “Han traitor?” Why and how traitors occurred guilt emotions or directed to be?Thirdly, the different power groups or ideologies stand on what standards to judge “Han traitor”? What does the phenomenon means and relations with national identity?In the wartime, based on two countries military and political relationship to distinguish between morality and immorality, people choose discourse strategies rather than an action. The country can use human resources management which means who owns better discourse,and this can also attack enemy and encourage national unity. Thus, “Han traitor” is not only mention about what the national image and identity but also the applications of political and military strategies.When Chinese view rapidly effect by foreign and diverse civilization views, different identities make different “Han traitor” judge standards. In conclusion, how to understand a “Han traitor” issue in multilateral views of strategies, human resources management, military, politics and etc..., it seems to be very significant. History can be restored, “Han traitor” become an adjudgment terms and always be the critical parts these should not be ignored.
keywords ｜
Han traitors, National Identity, human resources, discourse strategies, self-orientalization